Since my childhood, I repeatedly suffered from very painful canker sores—open, inflamed spots in the mouth, usually quite far forward on the inside of the cheeks and sometimes on the inner sides of the lips.

I realized that it was related to the consumption of sweets and thought for a long time that the not-so-wholesome and industrial ingredients must be responsible for this reaction. Therefore, I held back for a while from eating sweets in general.

Over time, I noticed that the reaction occurred mainly when snacking on certain sweets such as chocolate crisp clusters, but I didn’t think much of it, assuming that the ingredients were particularly unfavorable in those.

Over the years, I tried several remedies to treat the symptoms, hoping for quick relief, since the pain, especially while eating, was extremely unpleasant and lasted many days. Almost nothing really helped. The only thing that worked quite well for me after about two treatments was highly concentrated acetic acid with about 20–24% acidity. A cotton swab was soaked with it and rubbed onto the sore, which is certainly not for the faint-hearted. It was another kind of torture, but one that paid off, because the pain subsided more quickly—either due to the cauterization of the sore or possibly of the nerves in that area. Without treatment, it could easily take a week or more before one could enjoy food again without pain.

Only later, when I became more familiar with the 5 Biological Laws, it became clear to me that the reaction was very likely related to the fact that, as a child, I had repeatedly helped myself to the family’s chocolate stash and my brother’s as well, and was caught and scolded several times.

There is also a very similar account where a person developed canker sores after eating nuts, ever since being confronted with the “forbidden fruit” and a carpet beater. This case was very similar to mine, although I don’t recall any physical punishment.

In such cases, one subconsciously wants to be separated from what was eaten (associated with the consequences imposed by a person), and the oral mucosa begins to form ulcers (cell loss) during the active phase, with the archaic biological purpose of enlarging the oral cavity—probably to make it easier to get rid of the forbidden bite. The affected spot can then appear either locally (depending on the sensory association) or in various places in the mouth, depending on the person involved in the original conflict.

During the healing phase, the tissue is restored with inflammation, swelling, and redness. Since the oral mucosa belongs to the throat-mucosa pattern, pain begins quite early, already during the conflict-active phase. It’s also possible that canker sores can arise from a morsel conflict in the submucosa, but in that case, a buildup of cells would occur first, and pain would appear only in the healing phase when the ectodermal layer is breached or affected, since the endodermal growth process itself goes largely unnoticed. These processes also take longer. The conflict theme there would be about wanting to grab or spit out a food morsel—or symbolically another kind of “valuable morsel”—more effectively. However, in my case, this was not the underlying meaningful biological special program (SBS).

Since becoming aware of all this, my canker sores have belonged to the past, and I can no longer trigger them by eating certain sweets. I know now that I buy the sweets myself and no longer acquire them illegally, and I am no longer in the situation of the child who gets the deserved scolding for it. I still sometimes get in trouble with my wife when I overdo it with the sweets stash, but fortunately, replenishing it quickly prevents a new DHS or the reactivation of an old track. Such a practical solution of buying new supplies was unfortunately not possible for me as a small child.

Thanks to all researchers for these liberating insights!